You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The methodology of both psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, which is that of introspection and empathy, is simply not the same as that of chemistry and physics. As therapists, we are part of the system, and we cannot observe without participation. Although this is a fact of which we are all quite aware, usually we treat it as an unfortunate contaminant, and this then leads us to try to ignore its theoretical import. Classical psychoanalysis would do away with or minimize it by interpretation; the viewpoint of Kohut would replace it by transmuting internalizations as well as interpretations; but in psychotherapy we have an added task of assessing just how much we must work on the need for the elimination of the functional role of the therapist. To be sure, one must differentiate and clarify the so-called transference reactions related to the incestuous objects of childhood from those directed to self objects. This is an easier job in analysis, where the focus of the neurosis is enhanced and encouraged. In therapy, such clarity is often lacking. The psychology of the self best allows us to determine how and when we are utilized by our patients and to test how well they can handle our absence. The major advantage given to us by this perspective is that of being aware of the mirroring and idealizing aspects of self development.