Le Guen, like Chiland, argues against the classification of philosophers into oedipal and nonoedipal, both in principle and in the case of Spinoza cited by Pasche. According to Le Guen, psychoanalysis has no right and no privilege to make moral judgments even in Freudian terms on what is not within its specific field. All that is human is not in this field, and there are many risks in overstepping the restricted area of psychoanalytic appropriateness. Le Guen argues

against Pasche's discussion of anxiety and examines Freud's concept of anxiety to show inconsistencies in Pasche's argument.