You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The authors, who are interested in the Kleinian School, seek to clarify the term metapsychology and to formulate Kleinian metapsychological points of view. They divide metapsychology into two areas, which are, from a logical point of view, clearly differentiated. The first area encompasses the basic hypothesis of a theoretical psychoanalytic system. In it are stated problems of definition, validation, refutation, etc. Several items are discussed: 1) the theory of primitive mental functioning which postulates the existence of an ego from birth, capable of perceiving anxiety, developing primary defense mechanisms, and establishing object relations; 2) the theory of the structuring function of projective identification and introjection; 3) a theory of object relations, which includes the hypothesis of an unconscious fantasy from which derives in part the concept of an inner world; 4) the theory of the positions which establish a hierarchy of mental functioning in the concepts of psychotic anxieties (paranoid and depressive): and 5) a different conceptualization of the death instinct and its vicissitudes from which derives the concept of primary envy, among others. The second area designates the implicit or explicit conceptual framework which an author uses in his investigative work, such as the "points of view" of Rappaport and Gill. In this area the Kleinian metapsychological points of view are: 1) the positional; 2) the political economic; 3) the spatial; and 4) the dramatic. Each of these is discussed. The epistemological value of these points of view is that this delineation allows one to know and to understand how certain Freudian psychoanalytic theories have undergone modification that results in a different set of conceptualizations. The authors conclude by saying that neither their point of view nor Freud's should be deemed to explain mental phenomena. The points of view only describe the broadest concepts, implicit or explicit, used by an investig