You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Henny focuses on Freud's 1891 paper, "On Aphasia," and attempts to place it in the context of Freud's intellectual development toward a purely psychological theory. Freud was a pupil of Bruecke and Meynert. We forget how excellent a neurologist Freud was at this time, and we overlook his extensive knowledge about aphasia. His work was original, and it questioned that of his predecessors. But by this time his neurophysiological work was of less interest to him. His final rupture with the neurological past seems to have occurred in the few weeks he spent writing the Project, four years after the aphasia paper was published. In his desire to understand, he constructed a fantastic neurology, a caricature of neurology. He was not preoccupied with perception, in contrast to present-day intensive research on the problem. However, in the article on the mystic writing pad, seduced by the little device, he made an attempt to explain perception and the registration of perception in the mnemic apparatus. In "On Aphasia" he had spoken of memory deficits at one or another stage of inscription. The mystic writing pad article seems to be a return to preoccupations more neuropsychological than metapsychological. While hardly any humanistic science has remained untouched by Freud's influence, psychoanalysis seems closed to contemporary discoveries, whether in anatomy, physiology, neuroanatomy, or neurophysiology. It is as if psychoanalysis cannot be enriched by the exciting fields of exploration in the neurosciences. Although there have been some attempts at rapprochement, the result is sometimes an unintended caricature, as when some writers would locate the unconscious in the right hemisphere. Nevertheless, Freud himself, as he showed in the note about the mystic writing pad, would hardly have disavowed efforts at a synthesis of findings in contemporary neurosciences.