You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Erroneous interpretation of Freud has occurred because psychologist-historians use common sense to test their theories and do not consult relevant documents. Eissler advocates the principle of "unrestricted exegesis" moving into "psychoanalytic common sense," i.e., a set of working hypotheses held in common by psychoanalysts. An analogy is examined and preconscious or unconscious imagery is reconstructed. Content may be interpreted in all possible directions: literal, literary, personal, historical, and symbolic. It "may be looked at as a day residue, as a derivative of a repressed impulse, as a biographical element, as a referent to a historical event, or as if it were part of a legend, fairy tale, or as an archaic symbol derived from any area of culture, religion, art, and so on." Eissler cautions, however, of the danger of overinterpretation.