You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This is an interesting book, on a subject worth thinking about, but difficult to assess. The author, at a Congress in Toronto on the history of psychoanalysis, noted again, having observed it many times before, the passion elicited by the subject of psychoanalysis, in the service of both its defense and its condemnation. Being at that time in the process of writing a book about a secret "Rundbriefe" circulated among a small inner circle around Freud, just after the defection and/or ouster of Jung from the psychoanalytic movement, in defense of the new science, the author felt that the tone and contents of this private correspondence might throw light on precisely this question of psychoanalysis as a disturber of peace and divider of people. This then became a leit (or heavy) motif of this book.
The author's aim thus came to have a double purpose: to trace the vicissitudes and meanings of this intimate exchange, and to throw light from it on the affective reactions of the world to psychoanalysis. While this two-pronged self-assignment added a double depth and purpose to the enterprise, it also constitutes an added difficulty to its goal and methodology. Each of the investigative pursuits is complex in itself; to interrelate the two creates a more formidable challenge.
The contents of the original study, from which understanding of the new assigned task derives, consist of the history of this "secret" inner group around Freud, upon each member of which he bestowed