Baars briefly takes issue with two of Hilgard's terms. First, Baars claims there is “moment-to-moment internal consistency of conscious contents.” This may not be the same as the unity of consciousness Hilgard refutes. Second, since Baars feels there “is so much evidence for the internal consistency of momentary conscious experience”— for example, only one interpretation of ambiguous or impossible figures can come to mind at the same moment—he suggests talking of divided or dissociated aspects of self rather than divided or dissociated consciousness.