You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Certain patients overwhelm the analyst's capacity to contain both the patient and the analyst's own unbearable feelings. Though some such failures of containing may lead fairly quickly to self-correction and others to clinical impasse, our focus is on an in-between state in which the analyst's ability to tolerate his inevitable failures and gradually to (re)establish his containing capacities through difficult self-analytic work can lead to significant change that might not otherwise be possible. The authors argue that this internal psychological work on the analyst's part, which may require considerable time, effort, and suffering, is an important aspect of “good enough” containing. The unique chemistry generated between patient and analyst plays an important role in both establishing and maintaining this kind of productive analytic process.
In this as in our previous co-authored paper , the extensive sharing of ideas and collaboration in the writing process over a long period of time make it impossible to assign roles of primary and secondary authorship. Accordingly, we have chosen in both papers to list ourselves alphabetically in an attempt to indicate that considerations of primary and secondary responsibility for these contributions cannot apply.
Steven H. Goldberg is a Training and Supervising Analyst at the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis and a Personal and Supervising Analyst at the Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California.
Zenobia Grusky is a Training and Supervising Analyst at the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis and a Personal and Supervising Analyst at the Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California.