You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
A century after its heyday as a clinical diagnosis, hysteria is enjoying a second life as an object of historical study by clinicians and historians alike. Members of the multiple personality disorder movement find precursors in the late 19th-century French accounts of hysterical “double consciousness” (Hacking, 1995), and academics of several disciplines study every imaginable aspect of the subject. The three works under review, all examples of what Micale calls “The New Hysteria Studies,” are not equally valuable. King's long essay is an important piece of philological analysis and reception history of the concept of hysteria ascribed—falsely, she argues—to Hippocrates. (See Psychoanalytic Books, 6, 1995, 74-80, for a review of the other essays in Hysteria Beyond Freud.) Micale's Approaching Hysteria is a superb, profoundly learned book. The scholarship and argument of Libbrecht's Hysterical Psychosis can't stand comparison with either of the others.