You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In Part I of Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, Freud writes concerning perversion that, in most cases “the pathological character in a perversion is found to lie not in the content of the new sexual aim but in its relation to the normal” (161). This is one of Freud's main points in the Three Essays, that “normal” and “perverse” are terms defined in relation to each other: normal just means that which is not perverse, and perverse just means that which is not normal. If the content of one of these terms were to change, then, since it is the relation between them which is the constant, the content of the other would have to change too. For example,