You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Todd McGowan University of Texas Press, Austin, 2012, 232 pp., $55, ISBN-13: 978-0292737822
Unassumingly brilliant and surgically incisive, Todd McGowan’s recent monograph on the movies of Christopher Nolan, the unlikely director of both cult indie films like Memento and superhero-franchise international blockbusters like The Dark Knight, illustrates that Nolan’s impressively broad oeuvre actually comprises a consistent project to think cinematically about the mediation of truth by non-truths. Lies, deceit, illusions, and errors, far from being obstacles to or opposites of truth, are, for Nolan, preconditions of truth: “truth is the failure of the fiction” (p. 15). Linking this reversal to Hegelian philosophy and Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis, McGowan argues that Nolan’s insights are not only epistemologically consequential – bearing on how we can come to know ourselves and others, reality and the real – but also ethically charged. The ethics inhere in the practice of freedom that a lie discloses: “when we lie, we assert our freedom by detaching ourselves from the world as it is given to us” (p. 13). Such detachment activates a new relation to the world and possibilities for changing it: when the world is not sanctified, no transcendent beyond of the world is necessary for reform or revolution; hewing to fictionality exposes the fictionality of the world and invites new invention. “Believing in a real world of significance beyond the fantasy, we fail to act to change the structures in which we exist” (p. 17), but a cinema that aids the traversal of this belief can galvanize an ethics of fidelity to fundamental fantasies and a politics of new structures. Nolan’s cinema is not so much an example as the paradigm of this ethics, not so much a cinema as a meta-cinema – albeit one that avows the impossibility of meta-language. For while “the fundamental deception of cinema itself – the image passing itself off as reality” (p. 15) may function to perpetuate an image/real