You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Iapproach this subject from a perspective that is differ ENT from that of Joyce Slochower. I have deliberately high lighted the differences between her perspective and mine because comparative study helps to clarify thinking.
In the last sentence of her essay, Slochower defines the goal of the psychoanalytic process: “The ultimate goal of such a process is the development of a capacity to be with both the self and with the analyst in a truly intersubjective way.” I would say that this is not the goal of the process but one of its consequences. I would define the goal of the process thus: To acquire insight into inner mental life with the aim of fostering its development. Therefore, I do not get an insight into the inner mental life of the two patients whom Slochower quotes except through personal inference. For example, Slochower explains that Sarah was extremely sensitive to her analyst's emotional states (which she describes well so it is easy to imagine being in her shoes and treating such a patient). No discussion follows, however, of why Sarah was so sensitive to the analyst's emotional states. Slochower therefore introduces us to the intersubjective phenomenology without taking us further into the patient's inner mental life. In this particular case, I would infer that Sarah was in flight from an inner object of which she was terrified and so defended herself by cuing herself into something outside of