Neutrality, Resistance, and Self-Disclosure in an Intersubjective Psychoanalysis

The development of the clinical theory and technique of intersubjective psychoanalysis requires reconceptualization of the core concepts of neutrality, resistance, and self-disclosure. Current and historical usages of the concept of neutrality are examined in an attempt to deconstruct the role of neutrality within a hierarchical and gendered system. Neutrality is then reconceptualized as a relational event within the analysis that stands apart from transference-countertransference enmeshments. Neutrality is understood as a mutual achievement that cannot be claimed in an a priori manner by the analyst. Resistance is similarly reconceptualized as an aspect of a relational unconscious designed to maintain transference-countertransference configurations. This phenomenon is termed intersubjective resistance and, as a jointly held state, is most apt to reveal itself when the analyst breaches normative conduct. It is at these junctures that the analyst's self-disclosure and mutual exploration of the enactment become a powerful method for furthering the analytic process. An extended case vignette illustrates the use of self-disclosure for the purpose of understanding an enactment and unraveling an intersubjective resistance.