You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Every analysis involves oscillations in the ability to generate new meaning, depending on the nature of the anxieties present and containable by the patient, the analyst, or both. Breakdown in this creative process can result in treatment impasses when primitive anxieties are uncontained and projective identifications abound. In this article, I situate clinical impasses within the dialectic of presence and absence.
That dialectic requires that the tension be sustained between both terms in such a way that neither is fully negated and a space can exist between the terms, a space in which meaning can flourish and the recognition of freedom can be embraced. I view impasses as psychic and philosophical breakdowns in which presence and absence are polarized and the ability to constitute presence out of absence is lost. I examine this collapsed space as one in which goodness has become perverted in the mind of the patient. I then offer clinical examples in which the analyst discovers how attention to her own subjective experiences helps to decipher the meaning of unconscious communications. These subjective experiences include the emergence of an internal supervisor, subliminal thought and images, and dreams about the patient. These communications can then serve as tools to release the analytic couple from the bonds of presymbolic treatment impasses.
Rachael Peltz, Ph.D., is Analyst and Supervisor, Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California, San Francisco, and Adjunct Faculty, Wright Institute, Berkeley. Since 1991, she has co-chaired the Committee on Social Responsibility of the American Psychological Association's Division of Psychoanalysis.
I thank the following people for their helpful suggestions and support in the writing of this essay: Elliott Currie, Sue Elkind, Zeese Papanikolas, Ruth Fallenbaum, Marsha Silverstein, Jed Sekoff, Ray Poggi, Maureen Katz, Mary Margaret McClure, Irwin Hoffman, Stuart Pizer, and Stephen Mitchell. I especially thank Thomas Ogden for his inspiration and encouragement over the years.
Earlier versions of this essay were presented at the Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California, June 1995, and the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, September 1996.
© 1998 The Analytic Press