You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In reply to Phillips and Fuss, I consider the developmental action of affinity—in particular, Winnicott's (1958) propositions regarding “ego-relatedness” and “happy play.” Then, in response to questions raised by Fuss, I explore the function of models as tools—and the difficulties we face in changing our developmental vocabulary.