You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
We consider the relevance of forms of intersubjectivity in infancy to the nonverbal and implicit dimension of intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis. The term forms of intersubjectivity, within the adult explicit and implicit modes and the infant presymbolic implicit mode, is offered to clarify the multiple meanings of intersubjectivity. The ideas of infant intersubjectivity of Meltzoff, Trevarthen, and Stern that have particular relevance for psychoanalysis are highlighted: the dialogic origin of mind, the role of correspondences, and the idea that symbolic
We wish to thank the Kohler Foundation and the Edward Aldwell Fund.
The contributions of Joseph Jaffe, Frank Lachmann, George Downing, Mary Sue Moore, Ken Feiner, Lin Reicher, Doris Silverman, Suzi Tortora, Emlyn Capili, Michael Ritter, Sara Markese, Marina Tasopoulos, Lauren Cooper, Jessica Sarnicola, Emily Brodie, Hwee Sze Lim, Nicholas Seivert and Jessica Silverman are gratefully acknowledged.
forms of intersubjectivity are built on presymbolic forms. We build on their work to define a fourth position: that the full range of patterns of interactive regulation provides the broadest definition of the presymbolic origins of intersubjectivity, with correspondence being only one of many critical patterns. We additionally address the place of interactive regulation, problems with the concept of matching, the role of self-regulation, the role of difference, and the “balance model” of self- and interactive regulation. We take the position that all forms of interactive regulation are relevant to the possibility of perceiving and aligning oneself with the moment-by-moment process of the other. A broadened understanding of intersubjectivity in infancy sets the stage for a more fruitful exchange between infant researchers and psychoanalysts.