In Volume 22, Number 6 of Psychoanalytic Dialogues, in the article titled: “Response to Safran: The Development of Critical Psychoanalytic Sensibility,” by Irwin Z. Hoffman the following is the correct text on page 722.

With respect to my own evolving critique of traditional psychoanalytic theorizing (Hoffman, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006a, 2006b, 2009b), please see my statement in that regard in this essay (Hoffman, 2009a, pp. 1044–1045),which includes the following:

My critique of the premises for the privileging of systematic quantitative research and of neuroscience is not accurately lined up with the divide between the psychoanalytic practitioner and the psychoanalytic researcher; it is rather lined up with the broader divide between constructivism and objectivism in psychoanalysis, a divide that can be located within the commonity of non-research-oriented psychoanalytic clinicians. (Hoffman, 1998). (p. 1045)