You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This paper addresses what I believe is one of the fundamental implications of Davies' groundbreaking and controversial paper, “Love in the Afternoon.” I suggest that the “perverse scenario” between parent and child that Davies describes in the developmental psychopathology of her patient may, in fact, occur in many ways in the lives and histories of many patients. Such “perverse scenarios” may sometimes be less overtly sexualized, and more subtle, but they prove to be no less insidiously destructive of patients' psychic cohesion. In this context, the possibilities for perverse scenarios and confrontations with “moments of truth” may occur frequently, albeit less in dramatic ways, in the patient–therapist engagement. The paper suggests that effective therapeutic action inevitably requires of the analyst the kind of real “moment of truth” decisions that contain within them the fate, and the hope, for the psychic integrity of both analyst and patient.