You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
I describe a frustrating treatment relationship with a severely traumatized patient and consider what contributed to its successful outcome. Sexually and emotionally abused in childhood, traumatized in adulthood, Dani insistently kept associated memories and affect states sealed off and outside the treatment's scope. Dwelling with me in a deadened therapeutic space dominated by narcissistic imperiousness and apparent obliviousness to the other, Dani seemed unreachable. A single enactment broke into this deadened process and enlivened things, but this shift turned out to be temporary. Yet after years of flat, disengaged process, Dani changed dramatically. Querying the treatment's dynamics, I muse about what happened in our analytic enclave. Despite the clear therapeutic potential of both witnessing and intersubjective exchange in trauma work, there may be times when our tolerance for staying out—for not knowing—is clinically pivotal. By allowing our protected analytic enclave to remain nearly untouched and undisrupted—by keeping trauma out and in this sense un-bridged, this very fragile patient established a nontraumatic relational space within which an alive, hopeful, resilient experience of self imperceptibly coalesced.