You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The day after the election, reeling and sick at heart, our study group explored the various, disconcerting ways we were witnessing the shock and horror of the election, “radioactively” permeating the frame and reverberating within each analytic couple (Gampel, 1998, p. 363). Adrienne recounted how one analysand had for the first time revealed that her grandfather had been murdered when she was a child. This event was linked to the fact that she had always had
an escape hatch, or Plan B, at the ready, which had kept her from settling into her own life and relationships.
On hearing this story, I suddenly recalled that the phrase “It’s time for Plan B” had just come up as the denouement in my own dream that very morning, which I had completely forgotten. The uncanny echoing of this phrase sent a slight shock through me. The context of my dream was of a more personal nature, though resonating with the larger collective events. In the dream, the value of Plan B was almost the opposite of that in the clinical vignette, insofar as it seemed to represent not an ever-present escape hatch but rather a suddenly appearing alternate path that hadn’t existed previously, turning sharply away and downward from a pre-established route. The juxtaposition of these two contrasting but overlapping contexts revealed multiple layers of meaning in the phrase.
In addition to an alternate or escape route, Plan B can also be understood as a change of pattern, strategy, or goal; a new blueprint; or even a morning-after birth control pill. I wondered at all the nuanced meanings, and at the coincidence of the phrase recurring in such close proximity. Without the dream, I wouldn’t have been as struck by the simple phrase in the clinical vignette, and without the vignette, the phrase in my dream would have retained only the more personal meaning, or might not have been recalled at all.
These intersecting contexts became part of what Jose Bleger (1967) called the “institution” of the frame, the mor