You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
A positive view is taken of integrative analytic and bio-psychological Somatic Experiencing (SE) therapy for trauma. Levit’s case report is viewed as reflecting an early stage of the analyst’s development as an integrative clinician. A risk of integrative treatments is splitting between modalities of analytic functions including affect regulation. The present case is read closely. Commentary focuses on enactment and missed opportunities for analytic reflection, including (transference) meanings of SE interventions. Increased analytic attention to therapeutic process aims to open reflective space to discuss a wide range of experiences in treatment, including disappointments and other (more negative) aspects of transference, deepening the therapeutic experience, and reaching more broadly into sequelae of the patient’s developmental trauma than SE intervention alone. Integrated bio-psychological interventions are compared and contrasted with use of psychotropic medications in analytic therapy. Bio-psychological interventions such as SE have the advantage of adding resources for the analyst’s self-regulation as well.