In this response to the comprehensive commentary of my paper by Dr. Willock (this issue), I underscore the complexity of the multiple self-state interactions that appear to be managed by an “Executive Director.” Within this framework, I emphasize the inner voice in dreams as a fundamental element in the dream process. I describe the role of the inner voice in dreams as assisting the dreamer in dissection of inner conflicts. Whenever possible in analysis, I recommend including the inner voice in dreams as a facilitator for exploration and understanding of various matters related to the dreamer’s interpersonal relationships.