This discussion explores an ambitiously conceived paper by Giuseppe Civitarese and Chiara Berrini (this issue, 2022) as it attempts to shed light on Bion’s use of mathematical concepts—point and line—to better understand the process of symbolization and of desymbolization (e.g., attacks on linking) applied to the clinical situation. Employing the authors’ elaboration of Bion’s thesis that all psychical transformations occur and thinking develops (or fails to develop) within an analytic field marked by emotional experience, I show how this formulation is as relevant to reading a psychoanalytic text as it is to our work in the consulting room. Accordingly, my commentary focuses on how the authors’ theoretical argument and clinical vignette impacted me, which I liken to “possibility clouds” arising in the analytic field. I suggest that such an approach echoes the authors’ openness to “an extraordinary sequence of play” between analyst and patient that inspired their submission to this journal.