In her powerful paper, Kuriloff asks us to consider the space “between victims and victimizers.” Rothberg’s conception of the implicated subject is formulated to open precisely this space in a sociopolitical context; recent writing by my colleague David Mark and myself, along with other noted Relational thinkers, seeks to elaborate and extend this concept. Kuriloff’s compelling examples, linking the sociohistorical and the interpersonal, provide an opportunity to imagine what the concept of implication may add: challenging us to inhabit our position as injurer in relation to the other while simultaneously making it more bearable to do so. The concept presumes multiplicity; we can be both injured and injurer in interpersonal contexts, and proximate to victim in some historical contexts and perpetrator in others. In the intimacy of the dyad or in a large group, inhabiting our own implication facilitates bearing responsibility, witnessing the other, and moving into dialog.