You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In this response to Hartman and Clough, this issue, I delve into an expanded view of autopoiesis through an unstable form of text – poetic writing – as I further play with indeterminacies. I ponder about a Hartmanian-Cloughian socially engaged psychoanalysis and its affordances to be noisy while harnessing the indeterminacy of infinite (yet always contingent) translations. With these, I further explore their proposal to shatter a dominant information infrastructure along with boundaries of the social and the psychic.