In this discussion, I respond to Emily Seidel’s co-location of modern dance, psychoanalysis, and queer theories, from my particular perspective as a clinical psychologist, psychoanalyst-in-training, and former professional modern dancer. I specifically discuss Seidel’s proposals about the adjacency of psychoanalysis and dance, as well as her inclusion of queer theory’s critique of “social narrowing,” thinking about ways in which this narrowing gets exerted on both bodies and imaginations. I consider Seidel’s clinical vignette, which illuminates ways in which spontaneous entry into a shared imaginative space, or an open-channel, supported revitalization in a psychoanalytic treatment. I think about this example alongside similar channel-opening experiences in long-term, collaborative, dyadic relationships in creative process. I discuss the ways in which both psychoanalysis and dance can support queerer and more three-dimensional movements, both imaginative and embodied, awakening parts of experience that have been narrowed, deadened, or foreclosed.