You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This essay offers a response to Giuseppe Civitarese’s “The Original Encounter: Psyche, Eros, and the Intercorporeal Bond” by concentrating on the idea that each analyst should construct a personal myth of psychic birth. Arguing that psychic birth is not a single event but an ongoing process, the author proposes a recurring pattern of mystery, ordeal, and meaning as a way of understanding how new psychic life emerges. The essay develops the notion of an “unconscious we” through a series of mythic and developmental scenes, including early human group life, fetal experience, birth, infancy, and the family as a “second womb” of symbolic and intersubjective formation. Drawing on Bion, Freud, Stiegler, and the myths of Epimetheus and Orpheus, the paper suggests that psychic development depends on the capacity to tolerate absence, uncertainty, and transformation so that new meanings, ideas, and emotional realities can come into being. In clinical terms, the essay does not propose a technique so much as an ethical-aesthetic stance of curiosity toward the unknown, the not-yet, and the emergence of novelty within analytic experience. It concludes by reflecting on human interaction with artificial intelligence as a contemporary extension of the “unconscious we,” a new intermediate space in which unfamiliar forms of thought and meaning may arise.