You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Dr. Lubin's study seems to be well documented, and for this reason it certainly needs a more comprehensive discussion than I can offer. I have to confine myself to two brief comments.
By now the Wolf-Man story has grown very long and has been expanded far beyond the horizon of the original clinical interest. And yet, has anyone so far speculated upon the fact that by birth and upbringing the Wolf-Man was a Christian whereas his analyst was a Jew? Unconscious anti-Semitism (a descendent of the much resented but nevertheless still valid “Homo homini lupus”) should at no time be excluded, particularly not in a Russian brought up in the heydays of pogroms. Is a child who sees Christ on the Cross not inclined to ask: “Who put Him there?”
Interest in those aspects which determine mental content can obscure the importance of psychic functioning and of the mechanisms involved in it. Freud used the Wolf-Man in his “Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety” to illustrate how the earliest infantile phobias interact with obsessional reaction formations, or that, in other words, traumatic situations and anxieties are the germs from which the infantile neurosis grows.
One of the many details I agree upon with Dr. Lubin is that concerning the Wolf-Man's artistic activities in later life. However, the transformation of sadomasochistic fantasies and of guilt in the transference relationship could perhaps be more profitably shown in case studies of more recent date.