The Analysis of the Transference: A Matter of Emphasis or of Theory Reformulation?

It has been merton gill's fate to be an acknowledged leader in (American) psychoanalysis almost from the beginning of his career. An uncommon percentage of his writings have been almost instantly — and justly — hailed for their critical influence at particular points in the history of analysis in America, in relation both to psychoanalytic clinical practice (and its relation to the derivative dynamic psychotherapies) and to psychoanalytic theory formulation (in the ascendency and then the decline of ego psychology — the apotheosis of metapsychology). Witness the 1954 paper, “Psychoanalysis and Exploratory Psychotherapy,” which (together with Edward Bibring's essay of the same year) more than any other contributions from the various panels and symposia of 1952-1954 set our understanding of the nature of psychoanalysis as a therapy, in all its similarities to and differences from the congeries of dynamic psychotherapies elaborated within its framework. Or consider the 1959 paper co-authored with David Rapaport, “The Points of View and Assumptions of Metapsychology,” which so concisely defined and capped the full elaboration of the metapsychological points of view including the co-equal placement among them of the adaptive point of view. Consider the 1963 monograph