You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Two phenomena, the increased acceptance of psychoanalytic theoretical pluralism and the modification of our psychoanalytic professional structures around the settlement of the famous “lawsuit,” signaled the major changes of the decade of the eighties. It is conceivable that the end of the eighties, in psychoanalysis as in the “real world,” may mark the end of several of our own cold wars. Our previously relatively orderly theoretical borders, once forming an iron curtain that was impervious to ideas from “the other side,” now seem permeable and even welcoming. The tenacious maintenance of certain theoretical and political boundaries — our Berlin walls, if you wish — that seemed so important until recently, and that has been the source of friction and battle for decades, has seemed increasingly quixotic rather than scientific; perhaps this will lead to an era of greater psychoanalytic cooperation and discourse, if not harmony. As in the “real world,” this peace may be accompanied by enormous confusion and a period of disorderly growth and perhaps regression, as we attempt to adapt to new circumstances.
The settlement of the lawsuit brought by a group of psychologists against the American Psychoanalytic Association, the International Psychoanalytical Association, and others, signaled the dissolution of certain political barriers between American and international psychoanalysis, and between medical and nonmedical