You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
RECENT PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY HAS MOVED INCREASINGLY toward a relational, intersubjective, and social—constructivist stance. In this view the psychoanalytic encounter is seen as mutually coconstructed between two active participants, with the subjectivities of both patient and analyst contributing to the form and content of the dialogue that emerges between them (McLaughlin, 1991; Hoffman, 1992; Ogden, 1994). The current emphasis in analytic writing on the importance of enactments in the treatment situation attempts to keep the lens focused squarely on the point of contact between the two analytic participants and on the form of the implicit transactions that emerge between them (e.g., Ogden, 1994). Clinical descriptions acknowledge the active contributions of both partners to the co-construction of the enactment, even though the primary clinical interest may be in those features of the enactment that echo problematic aspects of the patient's interactions with other important people (Jacobs, 1991; Hoffman, 1992). Enactments have been viewed as