You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
From bitter searching of the heartQuickened with passion and with painWe rise to play a greater part.
Psychoanalysis, our Western Science of Subjectivity, Has Shed light on the ways in which human love is laced with ambivalence—as well as wishes for dominance and submission, fears of abandonment and engulfment, struggles of attachment and separation, and fantasies of infantile dependence and idealized independence. But has psychoanalysis helped us to love any better? In this era of postmodern, multinational, commercially-driven images of romance and sexual desire, is psychoanalysis helping us become more capable of love? Yes, I would say that it is.
And yet, there is still a lot of confusion about human love, even among psychoanalysts. Love still gets conflated with attachment, passion, certain brain states, and positive mirroring. In everyday conversations, love is frequently confused with its near companions of romance, desire, idealization, admiration, and compassion. I believe that love rides on the same bus with these companions, but the others get off at different stops; love stays