You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
We have come to a moment in history that may be propitious for the relationship between psychoanalysis and the group world, and could include increased cross-fertilization and enrichment. Psychoanalysis has moved away from its singular focus on and prizing of the intrapsychic functioning of the individual, as was the case with Freud and then ego psychology. With the emergence of the relational theories, psychoanalysts have broadened their interest to how two persons effect one another, one short step away from the smallest of groups: three persons. Neuroscientific findings provided by recent brain research have underscored implicit communication, mirror neurons, and the like—thus shining light on and increasing knowledge about human behavior that has always been part of the group therapist’s theoretical frame. Psychoanalysis is incorporating these findings. As this change becomes part of the common fabric of psychoanalysis, group therapists and theorists may renew their interest in collaborating with psychoanalytic colleagues. These developments may be, in part, why Lichtenberg’s theory has a naturally occurring place for group dynamics and findings within it (personal communication, 2016). If we can move beyond the history and cultivate a spirit of openness within both camps, the time may be here when each community is positioned to be enriched by receiving the knowledge from the other and growing to the benefit of all practitioners and patients.