On the Conditions of Care for Speaking About Racial Trauma and Othering

This article explores the psychological and physiological impacts of racial trauma and the challenges of sustaining discussions about identity-based harm, particularly for mental health professionals of marginalized identities. Drawing upon Resmaa Menakem’s concepts of “clean pain” and “dirty pain,” and her “Three S’s” framework – which recruits safety, stability, and strength – the author examines strategies to mitigate the distress that often accompanies conversations about racism and othering. Despite the benefits of these approaches, the emotional toll of engaging with racial trauma remains significant. The author ultimately identifies Care as the driving force behind persevering in these discussions, framing it as both a therapeutic and political act. Utilizing political scientist Deva Woodly’s “Politics of Care,” the article argues that recognizing individuals as inherently valuable necessitates equitable attention to their well-being. Furthermore, the author invokes Audre Lorde’s assertion that self-care for marginalized individuals is an act of political resistance, highlighting how caring for oneself and others in the face of systemic oppression is an assertion of self-worth and agency. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of trauma-informed preparation for clinicians and patients engaging in discussions about racial discrimination. By fostering environments that support self-regulation and resilience, mental health professionals can help counteract the silencing effects of racial trauma, ultimately contributing to broader social healing and justice.