You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This paper explores the idea that psychoanalytic writing is more than the conveyance and elaboration of theoretical principles and presentation of clinical vignettes. It proposes that a reciprocal process occurs in psychoanalytic writing wherein facets of the treatment described can infiltrate and influence the author’s experience of writing; and in turn, the analyst’s idea and act of writing about a patient can infuse a treatment, or at least the understanding of a treatment. It develops further the idea that the dimensions of an analysis that break through to the awareness of the analyst as she or he writes are ones that are not apparent during treatment and are pressing for expression. This paper also explores the aesthetic overlap between fiction and analytic writing, with an emphasis on how characters (writer and subject) meld and exchange in both mediums. Last, the idea of “parsing words,” an exercise in analyzing clinical process word by word with depth and specificity, is encouraged and explored. An illustrative case is presented in which writing (and paper-writing in particular) is a problematic theme for both patient and analyst.