You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The authors close the panel by mapping out and responding to Jon Mills’s critique of Relational psychoanalysis and provide a historical background within which to contextualize the framework for the debate. Specifically, they take up the flaws inherent in judging a theory based on an objectivist perspective and address indeterminate, decontextualized, and selective understandings of the constantly evolving theory and practice of contemporary relational and Relational psychoanalysis.