You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This brief essay introduces three papers by Hillary Grill, Sally Bjorklund, and Caryn Sherman-Meyer on the impact of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on women’s subjectivity. Focusing on the need for reproductive choice and autonomy for women, I preview the ways in which the papers collectively argue for continued psychoanalytic engagement with feminist issues in a post-Roe world.