You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
As global crises of dehumanization and meta-dehumanization—political, ecological, and moral—intensify, psychoanalysis faces both an ethical reckoning and a paradigmatic opportunity. Whereas traditional training continues to emphasize the individual psyche, the consulting room, and the clinical dyad, these are no longer sufficient containers for the complexities of contemporary life. I’ve proposed the addition of a “fourth pillar” to psychoanalytic training—one that grounds future clinicians in systems psychodynamics, community psychoanalysis, deliberative democracy, and large-group dreaming processes. Drawing here on my published work and clinical/community practice, including the development of the “open space dream field,” I engage Stavros Charalambides’s “group turn” in psychoanalysis and build on it to propose a sociocentric psychoanalytic vision that addresses the complex multiplicity of the field phenomena in which human beings are embedded.