You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This paper begins where treatment ended: with the psychotic break of a patient treated by a psychoanalyst-in-training over four years. The paper argues that contemporary American psychoanalysis, particularly within relational and intersubjective training cultures, has intensified a longer psychoanalytic drift away from psychosis. These frameworks carry a structural presumption: that both participants can experience one another as separate subjects capable of symbolic exchange. When they function not as one perspective among many but as psychoanalysis itself, they quietly reorganize the conditions of listening—orienting the analyst toward resonance and coherence precisely at moments when a patient may be unable to achieve them. In this treatment, that attunement rendered emerging psychotic states unrecognizable until collapse. The paper traces what was missed and why: the pressures beneath the break, the theoretical frameworks that shaped perception, and how a field that no longer expects to receive psychosis left both analyst and patient without a net. What remains are questions that do not settle.