You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The construct aloneness, proposed as a basic-level human need, parallel to and of the same valency as attachment, is viewed in the process of development over the life span. We suggest that focus on attachment and object relations has kept the regulatory function of detachment, and thus aloneness, in partial eclipse. Borrowing from the discourse of psycholinguistics, aloneness is viewed as the unmarked member of a pair of antonyms, aloneness/loneliness, rather than as the marked member of the pair, attached/alone. The contributions of psychoanalysts across models and infant researchers are recalled in the service of tracing the presence of an aloneness need. We offer examples from psychoanalytic child treatments to illustrate the juxtaposition of aloneness and attachment in analytic discourse at successive developmental stages.
I do this and I do thatI go here and I go thereAt times I like to be alone….“Near the Window Tree,”
Except perhaps in children's literature, aloneness has not been enthroned as a psychological need in the same way as attachment. Although recognized as an important and essential dimension of life by Winnicott (1958), Fromm (1941),