You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The author responds to Michael Pariser's (2005) critique by distinguishing between reduction and reductionism, by refusing to see philosophy and neuroscience as competitors, by rejecting the call to adapt psychoanalysis to the demands of managed care, and by using the ideas of Wittgenstein to point out the problems of too-facile translation between the languages of neuroscience and of emotional-relational experience.