You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Recent papers by Summers (2011) and Zamanian (2011) are compared for their differing understanding of what makes psychoanalysis “wild” and are critiqued for their arguable assertions. The pairing of the papers attests to the continuing generativity of Freud's ideas and the excitement of contemporary psychoanalytic theorizing.