You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Although emphasis on psychodynamic thinking has waned in assessment training, the ascendant Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS; Meyer et al., 2011) has reintegrated psychoanalytic concepts into empirical Rorschach assessment: R-PAS adds scores involving object relations, implicit dependency, aggressive ideation, and ego impairment. R-PAS has, however, excluded the psychodynamic framework for assessing ego involvement in the regulation of anxiety/dysphoria by eliminating the coding of Form Dominance in Shading and Achromatic Color (FDSHAC) that has been part of the Comprehensive System (Exner, 2003). This decision was based in part on concerns about efficiently and reliably coding distinctions among Form Dominant, Form Secondary, and Formless levels of FDSHAC. To establish that such distinctions can be coded reliably, we applied supplemental guidelines (Viglione, 2010) to evaluate reliability among four experienced assessors who coded determinants for 155 Rorschach responses, 115 of which required FDSHAC determination. Applying Gwet's AC2′s to ordinal scales, interrater reliabilities were good to excellent. Reliabilities were strongest for Form Dominance in Texture and Achromatic Color, modestly so for Form Dominance in Diffuse Shading, and problematic for Form Dominance of Vista. Among levels of Form involvement across FDSHAC variables, raters had the most difficulty distinguishing Form Secondary. We discuss considerations for clinical coding, psychodynamic configurational analyses for interpretation, and construct validation research.