You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The fate of metapsychology in contemporary psychoanalysis is peculiar. Few psychoanalytic concepts can be used without leaning, knowingly or not, upon metapsychological assumptions, yet many analysts remain reluctant to defend metapsychology as such. It has been treated variously as Freud's speculative excess, an unnecessary remnant of 19th-century energetics, or as a conceptual scaffolding best hidden behind clinical language. Cordelia Schmidt-Hellerau's Life Drive & Death Drive, Libido & Lethe is written against this retreat. The book, now in an updated version, undertakes the formidable task of reconstructing Freud's metapsychology as a systematic theory of psychic functioning and of extending that reconstruction through Schmidt-Hellerau's own concepts of libido, Lethe, drive, structure, and dynamic stability.
Schmidt-Hellerau does not arrive newly at this terrain. The present volume should be read as part of her long-standing intellectual program that includes her earlier article “Libido and Lethe” (1997) and subsequent essays on aggression and drive theory collected in Driven to Survive (2018). She has also written on clinical and applied psychoanalysis and, in her fiction, has explored memory, mourning, and dreamlike forms of psychic life. This breadth matters because the book is not an isolated effort to solve a technical problem in Freud. It is the most sustained expression of an author who has long argued that psychoanalysis still requires a “general theory,” provided that such a theory is internally consistent, useful, and open to revision.
The book's earlier reception already suggests the difficulty of the undertaking. Bass and Michels (2002), reviewing the original edition in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, recognized both the ambition and lucidity of the work while also registering the conceptual pressure created by so total a reconstruction of Freud. William Greenstadt, in the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, situated the book within the