You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Dr. Reich has been a known psychoanalytic writer, close to Freud. Subsequently he had a falling out with the psychoanalytic movement. The volume is interesting for much new material on Freud and the psychoanalytic movement. The author has a fertile mind, in fact too fertile; his theories go well beyond his factual data. The style is of the passionate, feverish Nietzschean type which has a philosophical and literary appeal rather than a scientific one. As in Nietzsche, one can find almost every point of view presented; yet one must examine mostly that which the author brings into salient view by his title and those sentences which he puts into italics. Claims are made which do not stand up under logic or ordinary scientific examination. The view is presented of no neurotic symptoms without involvement of the total character. One finds repeated the old concept that the universality of a sexual disturbance (the old featherless biped) in the neuroses proves that a disturbance in sexuality causes the neuroses. This is an example of the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc. The same would apply to the universal presence of a disturbance of sexuality in diphtheria; the reviewer hopes that someone has the wisdom to give him antitoxin in the event that he gets diphtheria. The same fallacy applies to what he calls the orgasm formula; mechanical tension—bio-electrical charge—bio-electrical discharge—mechanical relaxation. No doubt all phenomena have electrical measurability, but it is phantastic to carry this on to what might be called electromorphism or even sexual electromorphism. Much of the clinical data presented by Reich is interesting and valid, though most of it already has been described by others than himself and the half dozen psychoanalytic writers he is fond of quoting. He thus seems to