You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Berkeley, Columbia, Cornell, Harvard—and countless other—campus rebellions became a part of the academic landscape of America (and with variations, of many other countries) in the 1960's. They have evoked a torrent of commentary, analysis, and interpretation, from all manner of perspectives in the print and electronic media. What more is to be added at this date? I do not pretend to have the answer to all questions on campus disruptions, nor to be able to resolve the innumerable contradictions among prevailing interpretations. Rather, it is necessary though far from sufficient to explore one aspect of the phenomenon in order to arrive at greater understanding, that is, those aspects of the psychodynamics of participation in the rebellion that revolve around the Oedipus complex and its resolution. The available evidence on which such an analysis could be carried out is, to be sure, regrettably very far from ideal. The ideal would be the full-scale psychoanalysis of each of about 300-400 persons carefully chosen as a sample of active rebellion-participants, plus a comparable psychoanalytic study of a control group of a similar number randomly drawn from the same campus populations. To my knowledge no such study has been done or begun, nor does any such seem in prospect. I propose therefore to make do with what evidence is available from my own observations directly or indirctly bearing on the situation, and from the literature. The latter evidence is far from negligible in quantity, but extremely uneven, scattered, and very variably systematic in quality. To this modest array of data and commentary, I propose to apply a combination