You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Dr. Ellenberger set himself the task of writing a history of psychiatry that would be very different from any of our existing texts. He states that his book “is intended to be a history of dynamic psychiatry, based on a scientific methodology, with a detailed and objective survey of the great dynamic psychiatric systems, notably those of Janet, Freud, Adler and Jung” (p. v). Those readers who are surprised at the inclusion and position of Janet's name will have ample ground to explore Ellenberger's reasons.
One of the difficulties in this volume is that the author nowhere defines precisely what he means by dynamic psychiatry, nor does he in any way indicate its relationship to psychoanalysis. Presumably he intends to cover those psychiatric systems that emphasize the unconscious but he also includes references to psychosurgery, metrozol therapy and electric shock treatment. Despite the book's title, Ellenberger deals with the concept of the unconscious in only a descriptive sense of the term, not in a dynamic or other meaning. Nor, in fact, does he make a direct comparison of the various senses in which “unconscious” was used by Freud, Jung, Adler, and Janet. He also fails to explore the reasons why each of these men reached his own particular view of the unconscious. Ellenberger does place considerable emphasis upon the mythopoeic* function of the unconscious, and this is most