You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The new understandings that have been obtained through the clinical application of psychoanalytic self psychology have highlighted the need for a radical revision of the psychoanalytic theory of the unconscious (Shane and Shane, 1990). What follows is a progress report briefly summarizing an evolving theory of the unconscious that we believe is consistent with the basic principles of self psychology and its singular emphasis on the primacy of self-experience rather than instinctual drives. Our framework delineates three different realms of the unconscious. After describing our developing understanding of these different realms, we offer a formulation of the distinctive transformations that psychoanalytic treatment can bring about in each of the three domains.
In our first attempts (Atwood and Stolorow, 1980, 1984) to reconceptualize the unconscious, we distinguished two forms of unconsciousness that are important for psychoanalysis — the prereflective unconscious and the more familiar dynamic unconscious. Both differ from Freud's (1900, 1915) “preconscious” in that they can be made conscious only with great effort. The term “prereflective unconscious” refers to the shaping of experience by organizing principles that operate outside a person's conscious awareness:
The organizing principles of a person's subjective world, whether operating positively (giving rise to certain configurations in awareness), or negatively (preventing certain configurations from arising), are themselves unconscious. A person's experiences are shaped by his psychological structures without this shaping becoming the focus of awareness and reflection. We have therefore characterized the structure
Page 25of a subjective world as prereflectively unconscious. This form of unconsciousness is not the product of defensive activity, even though great effort is required to overcome it. In fact, the defenses themselves, when operating outside a person's awareness, can be seen as merely a special instance of st