You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Separation and loss have been important themes in the psychoanalytic literature since Freud (1920) wrote about his eighteen-month-old grandson's efforts to master a brief separation through repetitive play. Indeed, some writers have suggested that failure to gain mastery of separation during the pre-oedipal period is reflected in aspects of adult psychopathology. According to John Bowlby (1973), early experiences with attachment, separation, and loss become incorporated into “internal working models,” sets of expectations about the self, others, and the environment, which then serve to guide expectations and perceptions of close relationships throughout the lifespan. In the analytic situation, for example, Bowlby notes that some patients expect to be abandoned because of the nature of their early experiences, despite assurances from the analyst and lack of supporting evidence to the contrary. Aspects of early working models are thus evoked in treatment by events such as the end of the hour, the therapist's vacation or unexpected illness, and termination.
In the best of situations, how are separations mastered? Through observations and reconstructions of early childhood, infant researchers and developmental object relations theorists have offered some clear notions of how we develop and consolidate the capacities to remember the absent object, evoke its comforting presence through images, thoughts, and words, and function autonomously