You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Aggression partly motivates self-observing. This aggression includes not only “assertion” (Stechler & Halton, 1987) or gratification seeking, but also the destruction later considered by Freud (1920) to be a primary drive and by others later still to be the secondary consequence of threats to the existence or integrity of the self (Kohut, 1977; Stechler & Halton, 1987). For both patient and therapist the avoidance of self-observing is proportional to the destructive threat involved.
The threat in self-observing is related to two phenomena. First, the self must become divided into an observed and an observing function in order for self-observing to occur (Bach, 1984), and the self therefore becomes experienced as discontinuous (Mitchell, 1991) and not fully integrated, however momentarily. Such a cleavage of the self may be termed “fission.” Second, self-observing involves the same conflicts and affects that hold for aggression in general for a given individual.
I refer primarily to such threats and avoidance within the patient, but the principles involved apply equally for the therapist and could be usefully explored in a future article.
The following vignette exemplifies how the process of self-observing is accompanied by the conflicts and affects surrounding aggression in other facets of a patient's experience:
A thirty-eight-year-old divorced man has been coming for help with his poor self-esteem and reluctance to initiate or sustain relationships. Over a period of many months we have developed an appreciation for how his parents had shamed his attempts at candid and feelingful self-expression from earliest childhood, necessitating his retreat behind a false self which he